Appen Covid-19 symptom tracker har nu börjat få spridning i Sverige . Syftet med appen är att individer genom självrapportering ska kunna bidra med underlag för att forskare ska kunna beräkna och visualisera hur virusspridningen ser ut Sverige. Att skapa appar som privatpersoner kan använda för att bidra med självrapporterade uppgifter till myndigheter eller till forskning är inget nytt fenomen. I hanteringen kring corona har myndigheter dock haft vissa betänkligheter kring konsekvenserna av den här typen av data insamling. Ett långt framskridet arbete  hos MSB i frågan lades överraskande på is .
Det finns en mängd utmaningar när insamling ska ske via en app av individers självuppskattningar oavsett om det handlar om hälsodata eller inte. En av dessa utmaningar handlar om utformningen av själva appen som tas fram för att stödja sådan insamling.
I fallet med Covid-19 symptom tracker finns en hel del möjligheter till förbättringar av det grafiska användargränssnittet. Tyvärr har appen brister som är helt onödiga och riskerar att påverka insamlingen av data. I detta sammanhang är det viktigt att poängtera att kritiken mot hur gränssnittet är designat inte handlar om huruvida forskarna bakom studien gör ett bra jobb inom sin domän eller inte. Kritiken som lyfts fram i denna text handlar endast om dålig design av användargränssnitt.
Appen Covid-19 symptom tracker är tänkt att användas dagligen. Att designa en app som ska användas dagligen är en utmaning. I appen saknas funktionalitet som anpassar gränssnittet efter hur länge (antal dagar) som användaren varit igång med sin rapportering. Det är heller inte tydligt för användaren om rapportering genomförts en specifik dag eller inte. Det finns många kloka sätt att inspirera användaren att fortsätta med rapportering varje dag över lång tid. Inte minst finns en del bra inspiration att finna inom olika tränings- och hälsoappar.
Ett specifikt område som brukar resultera i frustration hos användare är hur inmatning av information utformas. I appen ligger ett omfattande fokus på att svara JA eller Nej på en rad frågor. Där används dropdown-menyer istället för designelement som är mer anpassade för att effektivt svara på just frågor med endast två svarsalternativ . Genomgående i appen används dropdown menyer i ganska stor omfattning istället för att använda mer specifika och effektiva inmatningsalternativ. Det är synd att en så viktig och relevant app inte har en mer effektiv design.
När den dagliga rapporteringen är genomförd är återkopplingen till användaren begränsad. Här skulle det varit på sin plats med lite specifik information till användaren kring den rapportering som gjorts. Det saknas också information kring rapporteringen som genomförts dag för dag över tid. Det tycks dessutom som att det går att skicka in rapporter flera gånger per dag. Avsaknaden av möjlighet att se sin tidigare rapportering påverkar användarupplevelsen. Sådan funktionalitet skulle kunna ge kraft att upprätthålla intresse så att användaren på ett uthålligt sätt fortsätter med rapportering av hög kvalité över tid.
Den nuvarande designen är enligt min tolkning i stora delar ett digitaliserat formulär som missar de möjligheter som ett modernt app-koncept skulle kunna innebära. Lite synd då en Covid-app skulle kunna vara så mycket mer, bara genom en lite mer genomarbetad design. Det skulle naturligtvis vara mycket intressant att se på användningsdata och spridningsstatistik för själva appen.
Det finns risk att nuvarande design minskar spridningen och användningen av appen, men förhoppningsvis inte i alltför omfattande utsträckning. Troligtvis kommer flera av ovan brister att vara korrigerade i en uppdaterad version av appen.
During this week, 10 phd-students have participated at the ISCRAM SUMMERSCHOOL organised by prof Caroline Rizza at Telecom Paris Tech. Today the different groups presented their work. Inspiring, fun and provocative ideas.
It was fun to see that the Design-camp that I held yesterday gave lots of input for their work.
Post-Doctoral Research Fellow Position Announcement
The Social Policy Center at Koç University, Istanbul (Turkey) invites applications for a post-doctoral research fellow for EU Funded research project on the Use of New Media Technologies in Emergencies.
The successful candidate will provide general research and administrative support, assist with and conduct fieldwork interviews and document analysis, contribute to the preparation and dissemination of reports and papers, and participate in preparation of additional project proposals for national and international funding agencies. The appointee must possess a PhD in a media/communication studies, media technologies (particularly social media and mobile technologies), social studies of technology, sociology or related fields; be able to demonstrate a developing record of research; and will have excellent communication and organizational skills.
Interested applicants should submit inquiries and applications electronically to Lemi Baruh firstname.lastname@example.org, by latest August 15, 2012 (applications will be processed on a rolling basis):
* Cover letter and a research statement
* Curriculum vitae
* Writing Samples (preferably copies of published work)
* Two reference letters (e-mailed directly by referees to the address above)
On thursday night at 21:20, my cellphone beeped and an SMS was received informing that the situation room was about to be manned at the fire and rescue services in Gothenburg. A sports arena was on fire and the response work was estimated to continue all night. I arrived to the main fire station at 21:50 and started a field-study and ended at 02:30. My focus this night was oriented on how the people working in the situation-room and the technology in use were intertwined. This particular incident provided very good insights on how people, procedures, roles and technology could be understood as entanglement in practice. In addition, it was also clear that technology is hardly used according the designers intention but reinvented and restructured in situated action. In return, the actions by the human actors were shaped by the material properties of the technological actors. Trying to separate human actors and technological actors seems difficult. I believe that we must view emergency response work as sociomaterial practice in order to move beyond the less meaningful discussion of technology vs method when it comes to exploring innovative conduct in future emergency and crisis response work.
I am looking forward to discuss entanglement in practice and sociomateriality with my fellow researchers during the ISCRAM2012 conference in Vancouver, 22-25 april.
This blogpost is heavily inspired by the following text:
Orlikowski, W. J. “The sociomaterialty of organizational life: Considering technology in management research.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (2009): 125-141
Over time, when professional, commercial and researcher communities have been talking about crisis and the many different strategies, policies, methods and tools to prevent and mitigate crisis, I start to wonder what do we mean when we say crisis.
The terms, accident, emergency, disaster and crisis do not address the same phenomena but on different scales. They have fundamental differences but are at the same time somewhat related. I would like to see some theoretical work trying to make the differences of these concepts explicit and clear. Especially if we are truly interested in developing IS/IT-artifacts that will have even a remote chance of actually provide agency. There are some seminal work on this topic by researchers in disaster sociology, but perhaps we are in need for some re-modeled versions for the IS/IT field.
Too often a large scale accident is talked about in terms of a crisis. Too often these large scale accidents are just very simple events but on a large scale. The casual relationships between actions and effects are clear. These accidents are solved by the use of standard operating procedures and efficient resource management. Large scale accidents are per se not a crisis. However, a poorly managed large-scale accident could develop into a crisis, not in terms of the physical dimensions of the accident, but the political dimensions.
A definition of crisis, should according to my view cover these critical dimenions:
* the temporal ambiguity
* the cascading dynamics
* the unclear causalities
* the boundary-spanning effects
I hope that the ISCRAM 2012 conference in the US will be the place where these important aspects are discussed and where the ISCRAM-community trigger discussions about crisis theory so we can start to make descriptive, predictive and normative models of how crisis grow, spread, and change form.
So before you submit to ISCRAM 2012, the deadline is approach fast, have a look in the book “What is a Disaster? – new answers to old questions” edited by Ronald W. Perry & E.L. Quarentelli (2005), and make an honest attempt to clarify your position. Chapter 11 by Arjen Boin is very valuable.
This blogpost contains some reflections based on my attendance on the ISCRAM Summerschool 2011.
The ISCRAM Summerschool 2011 focus this year on the challenges and development opportunities in Humanitarian Response Operations.
When you listen to the stories and insights from people (in UNDAC, UNOCHA, BFAST, MapAction) with long and rich experiences of humanitarian response work, they all seems to experience same fundamental problem, namely how to ensure efficient coordination based on smart information sharing. Based on their experiences, effecient coordination is the primary mean to obtain effective response work. The key to such coordination is found in smart information sharing. However, information sharing is not just a technical problem but also a procedural-, organizational-, and prestige-related problem. Many NGOs do apparently not their best to share what they know with the other organizations in their own cluster. Clusters do not always share information with other clusters. There are many examples and rich stories of how various UN-bodies and NGOs have debated and fought over really silly things, such as which truck from which organizations that should be first in a convoy. For me these are sad stories, but not on the other hand not surprising. Making organizations collaborating with each other is always difficult no matter sector or industry.
When these people give examples of the problems to share information during the early phase disaster response work, it sounds sometimes similar to the problems often expressed by professionals at local and regional agencies in Sweden. The primary difference is the scale of the problems. When you look at the cluster model used for organizing humanitarian response work, it seems to have some interesting similarities with the structural appearance of the Swedish crisis response system. There are probably good reasons to see how innovative solutions emerged in Humanitarian response community could be transferred to the national level as well as the reverse. It is evident that the difficulties to establish and maintain efficient information sharing is not primarily a technical problem but more related to attitude, incentives and competence.
Further, humanitarian response work rely heavily on good assessments of the local needs. Those need assessments inform what type of help that is needed and the volume of such help. It could be an interesting idea to explore how similar assessments could be done on a local level in Sweden in order to give the involved organisations more detailed insights in the early phase response work. Do we here in Sweden need a more developed and coherent process to conduct needs assessment when it comes to crisis response on a local and regional levels in Sweden? Would it be possible to outline a general need assessment procedure?
When you go travelling far away from home, on roads that remotley confirm to western standards, you start to see old things in new ways. The adoption of mobile phones among everyday, and I mean everyday people in Vietnamn is increadible. When I go on a motobike, suddenly my driver flips up his mobile and answer a call. Even in the jungle-like-forest, our guide grab his mobile phone and calls the motorboat guide in order to coordinate the pick up location.
A mobile phone costs 20 USD and everyone, even what seems to be the very poorest have one. It is amazing and an eye-opener for me. This experience, perhaps not a revolutionary one but still, underlines the importance that any designer or solution-provider in the field of emergency and crisis response MUST and I mean MUST base their technology support on mobile consumer oriented technology. If we are able to question some of the taken for granted truths regarding emergency and crisis response plus strive for new innovative solutions that have the capability to reach out to people with clever but not complex diffusion mechanism, only then are we moving the frontier of global crisis response capabilities.
At the ISCRAM 2011 summerschool in Tilburg Netherlands, I hope we will be able to form and materialize some really radical and smart ideas to contribute to that mission. Finding material for inspiration is not best done in meeting rooms but in interactions with real people in real settings. So move out and start exploring. Join the ISCRAM community to further explore the role and use of IS/IT for improved emergency and crisis response on local, regional,
national and global levels.
Please make sure that you have an extremely good reasons not to apply and attend for the ISCRAM2011 summerschool. The summerschool is the perfect place for phd-students and professionals in the emergency and crisis response domain to learn more about how information technology might be used to give you game-changing abilities.
The ISCRAM Summerschool will provide you with a valuable network of researchers and professionals, new insights, inspiration and ground breaking ambitions. Yes, I am a big fan of this Summerschool and Yes, I will be there to run a radical design camp where you and your team of new friends will explore cutting edge technology-use for crisis response and humanitarian response work.
People that attend the summerschool are willing to make their very best to push the boundaries of crisis response work. We hope that you will be one of them.
Deadline: 1st of june
Lets be honest, few of us knew that 2010 would be such an exciting year with snow-chaos in Sweden, volcano-ash paralysis in Europe and several devastating disasters around the world.
A good guess is that 2011 will be no different. We will be surprised by sudden events that require rapid response operations in areas we could not even imagine.
From a research point of view, I hope that we in the research community will become better in conducting rapid research studies to learn more about the complexities and challenges in the early phases of response operations.
I also hope that we will do better in studying response work that takes place when all the media houses and high-profile NGOs has left the disaster areas. It seems that there are many things yet to learn about long-term response work. Perhaps will the ISCRAM 2011 conference in Lisbon, Portugal
shed new light on this.
I am really looking forward to the annual ISCRAM conference. This year, I also hope that we will host a mobile video workshop at the conference to explore how mobile video could be used in a variety of response settings.
I wish you all a happy new year!
2011 will be a tough year with lots of exciting research.
ISCRAM2011 Call for Papers is out – Lisbon, Portugal, May 8-11 2011. Tracks on early warning systems, social media, GIS, standards, humanitarian challenges, and more. More information on http://iscram2011.lnec.pt/ . Do not forget to also visit the ISCRAM.org website for details on the ISCRAM association and access to proceedings from previous ISCRAM-conference.
With just a few weeks after the closing of this years successful ISCRAM-conference, it is already time to start preparing for the ISCRAM2011 conference. The 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management – ISCRAM 2011, will be held in Lisbon, Portugal, May 8-11, 2011. Read more at the ISCRAM2011 website.
This means that researches and professionals in the area in crisis and emergency response already at this early point in time book these dates. Lets join forces and suggest interesting discussion panels, workshops or exciting demos that really shows how we as a community can make a difference and improve international, national, regional and local response work. Maybe it is time for us to be more critical to the super-fast technological developments that promise much benefits but sadly too often delivers to little.
I am looking forward to a great conference, in a nice city with a crowd of inspiring professionals and researchers. For the ISCRAM2011 conference, I do expect several teams from Sweden including, MSB, FOI, CrisMart, LiU as well as the Crisis Response Lab. It would be excellent if the MSB team could consist of people that work on WIS and LUPP as well as people that work on the methodological aspects of emergency and crisis response.
See you all in Lisbon May 8-11 2011.